Some thoughts spring to mind after President Trump’s 100-minute address to Congress.

The first is that this 78-year-old man has amazing resilience and perseverance. Consider that in the past 12 months, he has had to spend hours listening to a kangaroo court proceeding before a hostile judge in New York, has maintained a campaign rally schedule that would daunt candidates half his age.

Mr. Trump, too, has participated in planning sessions for a detailed set of executive orders he might never have an opportunity to issue, has faced the former president and vice president of the United States in televised debates with moderators he had reason to believe were biased against him, and suffered a bullet wound that came within 1 inch of killing him. 

Around minute 98, he made mention of the last. This inspired sympathizers in the House chamber to echo the cries of “Fight! Fight! Fight!” he made as he rose above his Secret Service protectors.

A second thing to say is that, long before minute 98, his speech was almost entirely about what he has been doing, saying, proposing, and persuading others to do. Four paragraphs near the end gracefully evoked themes from history, but he otherwise spoke about his orders withdrawing from United Nations institutions, eliminating government censorship — while renaming the Gulf of Mexico — overturning racially discriminatory diversity, equity, and inclusion policies, and his Department of Government Efficiency’s identification of dubious U.S. Agency for International Development programs.

Instead of an overarching vision of where the world stands in history, he quoted President Zelensky’s letter apologizing for his comments the previous Friday and promising to sign the mineral rights deal he had criticized in the televised exchange that for once showed the public what leaders look and sound like in what diplomats call “a full and frank exchange.”

My third observation is that, as the Zelensky letter suggests, Mr. Trump is mostly getting his way. It was surely no accident that the narrow and previously fractious Republican majority in the House elected a speaker and passed a budget resolution with just one dissenting vote. Similarly, Mr. Trump’s top-level appointees have all been confirmed by the Senate. Neither foreign leaders nor domestic partisans want to defy this aggressive man with three years, ten months, and two weeks left in his term.

Fourth, there was no return to norms of civil discourse. Mr. Trump called former President Biden “the worst president in American history” and condemned “the open-border, insane policies that (Biden had) allowed to destroy the country.” 

Democrats have a point when they say Mr. Trump started this with his derogatory nicknames for 2016 opponents. Republicans have a point when they say Democrats escalated this with the Russia collusion hoax and baseless post-presidential prosecutions, unprecedented since President Jefferson’s treason prosecution of Vice President Burr. Yet neither Mr. Trump’s speech nor the Democrats’ childish behavior — that Mr. Trump predicted — in the audience moved to deescalation.

Fifth, Mr. Trump continues to disregard free-market economists’ — in my opinion, wise — advice. True, he is encouraging congressional Republicans to reup the tax-cut-for-all legislation they passed eight years ago, but with political payoff addons such as no tax on tips.

However, he also devoted multiple paragraphs extolling his imposition of tariffs, notably on Mexico and Canada. Economists point out that the tariffs will likely raise the American prices of many products, not just eggs. Voters won’t welcome something that looks like the Biden inflation, which could overshadow the Trump administration’s genuine successes.

This leads to my sixth observation: that he’s aware that the Constitution and calendar set limits on his time. Early in his speech, Mr. Trump noted that measures of illegal crossings on the southern border have immediately dwindled to almost nothing.

Smugglers and potential illegals clearly got his message, even as Democrats and much of the press argued that only new legislation could stop the flow. His only problem is that solving a problem can deprive you of an issue. President George H.W. Bush’s deft handling of foreign policy problems left voters concluding they didn’t need him after the Cold War. Success can breed failure.

Yet for a time, it can breed success. The first words of Article II of the Constitution state, “The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.” Those words, plus recent Supreme Court decisions, suggest that most decisions limiting Mr. Trump’s administrative powers will not stand. Current polls show that Mr. Trump’s disapproval is rising, but his approval rate is steady at just less than 50 percent, while Republicans keep making gains in party registration.

What is Mr. Trump planning for years two, three, and four? I’m not sure, and I suspect he’s not, either. Mr. Trump knows the Constitution’s 22nd Amendment prevents him from running again. He must know that’s likely to reduce his clout with foreign leaders and American politicians.

More importantly, he’s aware his time may be cut short. In the House chamber, as in his convention speech on July 19, he remembered how he had narrowly escaped death on July 13. “I believe my life was saved that day in Butler,” he said, “for a very good reason. I was saved by God to make America great again — I believe that. I really do.”

Like him or not, he is a formidable man.

Creators.com